Search the MySQL manual:

D.2.2 Changes in release 4.1.0 (03 Apr 2003: Alpha)

Functionality added or changed:

User Comments

Posted by [name withheld] on Tuesday November 26 2002, @4:22pm[Delete] [Edit]

It would be nice if more attention were spent on the
embedded server; there are many people who I'm
sure aren't quite satiated with level of progress at
the moment...a shared library (DLL) would be
helpful, for instance. Also, it'd be useful if an
embedded server could be accessed via TCP/IP or
sockets (this would be a compile-time option, so as
not to bloat the normal version).

Posted by Mark Fleeson on Wednesday January 22 2003, @3:35pm[Delete] [Edit]

I would like to encourage the work on the primary linux server first, not the embedded one (with reference to the previous comment). As a user of mysql since it's first version to get sub-select into a production version would be fantastic. We're currently a very large user of replication, one master - 18 slaves, getting the reliability of 4.1 will be great. Please keep up the good work.
Thanks

Mark
www.cd-wow.com

Posted by neil on Sunday February 9 2003, @1:48pm[Delete] [Edit]

I think that the change in TIMESTAMP format was unfortunate. The first I knew about it was when my hosting company upgraded the server last week (they didn't tell me of course) - I got a call about my sites yesterday. Lots of scripts either threw up errors or didn't display properly. Having just tracked this down, I have a lot of work to do this week trying to fix stuff.

Posted by gabriel on Wednesday March 19 2003, @1:16pm[Delete] [Edit]

More advanced REPLICATION is also important to me, and my company.

Posted by Chris Lamb on Tuesday March 25 2003, @9:20am[Delete] [Edit]

I am cheered by the very needed inclusion of subqueries and derived tables. Very badly missed by myself, particularly. I am not demanding flawless,enterprise resilience - I find MySQL handles my web apps very well, and the featureset being enhanced is a great benefit.

Posted by Derek Gabriel on Wednesday April 9 2003, @8:45pm[Delete] [Edit]

Bravo gentlemen! Keep up the great work.

Posted by Ludger Kluitmann on Wednesday April 9 2003, @11:33pm[Delete] [Edit]

You did a great job. In reference to previous messages I agree. The most important things are advanced replication, sub queries and derived tables.

Posted by Adam Sanderson on Wednesday April 23 2003, @4:47pm[Delete] [Edit]

Just wanted to mention that adding sub selects will be greatly appreciated. They're very usefull for multi step data processing tasks.
I hope 4.1 reaches some level of stability soon :)

.netghost

Posted by Joeri Willems on Thursday May 15 2003, @7:16am[Delete] [Edit]

Great addition of the awaited subqueries!!
But oh nooo, now i finally worked out an update that makes use of them, and now suddenly i spot the TIMESTAMP 'bug'. I'm completely in trouble now, as i am running MySQL on a Windows host, and there is no ODBC driver out yet that can 'read' the new TIMESTAMPS... Please upload the compatible ODBC driver to the database!

Posted by cesaralcaide on Thursday May 22 2003, @1:50am[Delete] [Edit]

Enhorabuena. Estabamos esperando las SUBQUERIES para poner MySQL en producción. Muchas gracias al equipo de desarrollo.

English: thanks very much, mysql development team

Posted by [name withheld] on Tuesday July 22 2003, @11:41pm[Delete] [Edit]

Please enable setting AUTOCOMMIT on database startup!

Add your own comment.